Article Critique of Moscow to insist Russia and China join chemical Research Paper

Article Critique of Moscow to insist Russia and China join chemic arms probe by Reuters & AP - Research Paper ExampleWith this in mind, the two fightring factions do not want to take responsibility and be in that respectfore blaming one another for the misfortune that one of them caused and led to great damage to the country. The conflict in Syria, which is between rebels and the government has raged on for two historic period and has caused the deaths of over 70,000 people in the course of its life, that is still going on. The correctness rages on in that the rebels are sweating to take over power from the current government, where the war is beyond taking power for either group. Putting this into perspective means that the group that wins shall not be held accountable for the loss of lives and even the destruction of attribute that has been experienced countrywide, as well as the civil unrest. The loser will solely be responsible, whereby it is upon the loser to admit defeat and accept all that has occurred with no option of redress or appeal. In addition, the article addressing the Syrian conflict brings into perspective the problem of a conflict that is too late to stop as all parties have too much to lose considering that, the government has put its all in the war against the rebels, while the rebels to have done the same. In addition, the rebels are backed by a good section of the civilian population, which means that the government is almost on the losing side due to the presence of civilians. In this case, civilians do a good bargaining chip for the rebels, as the government is bound by international law not to engage civilians using the military or even by use of unnecessary or excessive force. Consequently, the outcome is that the government is losing, which makes the rocket issue even more critical for them as a loss in the war is guaranteed for them to take political and legal responsibility for the war. It is at this point that the missile issue comes up again as it highlights an attempt to foil the attempts of one side of the conflict at clinching or maintaining power. This is evident and might appear biased towards the rebel side, as logical analysis would destine the ability to fire missiles lies with the military. The same military backs the government, where the government is at war with rebels, and the whole situation does not look for the government, but the rebels (Reuters and AP). On the other hand, the missile could be part of intricate plan to oust the current government by forcing it to take responsibility for the said weapon. It is due to this that the international society in the form of the United Nations and the veto powers in it to look at the situation ad and determine the origin and the intent of its launch in relation to the Syrian conflict. The main concern of the international community, however, is not on the use of missiles against a civilian population but is instead focused on the use of c hemicals in the missile. This is a major contravention of the laws of engagement in the event of war in an agreement that goes as far back as the 19th century, where there were signed treaties against the use of chemical warfare against the people, where even soldiers are included. Another perspective of this issue in the use of chemical warfare is what the international community stands to gain.